Tuesday, February 16, 2010

02/01/10 - Approved Regular City Commission meeting minutes

MONDAY

FEBRUARY 01, 2010

The Governing Body of the City of Pratt met in Regular session in the Commission Room located in City Hall.

PRESENT: Jeff Taylor Mayor
Bill Hlavachick Commissioner
Eric Nystrom Commissioner
Willy Peltier Commissioner
Victor Graf Commissioner

ALSO PRESENT: Dave Howard City Manager
LuAnn Kramer City Clerk
Ken Van Blaricum City Attorney
Diana Garten Finance Director
Steve Holmes Chief of Police
Russell Rambat Public Works Director
Brad Blankenship Building Inspector
Kelly Hemphill Dir. of Electric Utilities
Bruce Pinkall Recreation Director

CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Taylor called the regular meeting to order. The Mayor instructed the Clerk to note that all Commissioners were present.

Mayor Taylor reminded the audience that the meeting may be taped and/or recorded.

MINUTES:

A motion by Commissioner Nystrom to approve the minutes of the January 18, 2010 regular meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Peltier and carried unanimously.

OPEN AGENDA:

Frisbee Golf Tournament:
Mr. Ryan Beisner approached the Commission concerning a winter tournament for frisbee golf. Mr. Beisner commented that they had done this last year and had installed underground equipment in Lemon’s Park. Mr. Beisner stated that the tournament would be on March 6th and they would leave Sixth Street Park and Lemon’s Park just as they had found them.

Mr. Beisner explained that they hold this tournament to raise money and food for the local food bank and that they had forty participants in last year’s tournament. Mr. Beisner commented that they collected about 250 pounds of food and about $500 in cash for the food bank. Mr. Beisner stated that they work closely with Mr. Mark Eckhoff, Mr. Russell Rambat and Chief Steve Holmes so that there are no complications while the tournament is going on.

Commissioner Hlavachick commented that they had donated quite a bit of food and he appreciated them doing that. A motion by Commissioner Hlavachick to approve the Pratt Disc Golf Club to use Lemon’s and Sixth Street Parks on March 6th for their winter tournament. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Peltier and carried unanimously.

Trespassing on property:

Ms. El Vena Barnes, 592 Terrace Drive, questioned City Manager Dave Howard as to why he was taking measurements in her yard. Ms. Barnes commented that they had finished the house in 1968 and had purchased all the correct permits. Mr. Howard stated that he was not in her yard to measure anything and if he was going to do that, he would knock on her door and let her know. Ms. Barnes commented that she was sure it was him, but she had thought that someone was in her house. Ms. Barnes explained that she had left a key with the police department a long time ago in case they needed in. Mr. Howard suggested that Ms. Barnes call the police if she thinks that someone is in her house, even if she thinks it is him. Police Chief Holmes commented that he had looked for the key, but had not found it and told her to call 911 if she suspects someone is there. Ms. Barnes commented that the police have been good to her, but it bothers her when things like this happen.

BUSINESS:

DISCUSSION ON SALE OF PROPERTY TO FIRST SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH:

Mayor Taylor commented that there were two Commissioners that were unsure about the purchase of the property to the First Southern Baptist Church at the last meeting, so it was tabled until this evening. City Manager Howard commented that Commissioner Peltier had asked him to see if there was a way to stake the boundaries of the property that the church was interested in buying. Mr. Howard explained that he had had Public Works Director Rambat go out and GPS it and cone off the area, but then the snow came. Mr. Howard apologized that he had not gotten in touch with the other Commissioners, but they had been busy with the snow removal.

Commissioner Nystrom commented that he had had discussions with citizens and they feel that the City is selling it too cheap and that we had said that the property would be put back on the tax roll and with this purchase, it would not be. Mr. Ernie Richardson, church representative, commented that raising the price of the property would not put it on the tax roll. Commissioner Nystrom agreed, but stated that it would get more money back into the City coffers.

Mr. Richardson commented that he had had a visit from Commissioner Peltier and Commissioner Peltier questioned if the church would be opposed to slicing off part of the 2.3 acres adjoining Maple Street. Mr. Richardson stated that they would be opposed to that, because along with the new construction of additional buildings, there would be parking areas also. Mr. Richardson commented that this would increase their existing space by fifty percent and, with regular kid’s activities, they would need an area for grass. Mr. Richardson added that it makes sense to have access to Maple Street for the parking lot and he did not feel that shaving the acreage off would negatively impact the City. Commissioner Hlavachick asked where the area was that was asked to be shaved off. Mr. Richardson explained that Commissioner Peltier had talked about the City maintaining where Maple Street would come in from Highway 61 then goes west and curves around. Commissioner Peltier commented that by maintaining 110’ of that, we could have five or six lots that would net $10,000 a year in taxes. Commissioner Peltier stated that the City did this project as an investment for growth and we were not doing that on this proposal. Commissioner Peltier commented that his storage buildings by the college are on 1.9 acres and that was a lot of land and he had talked to a few people in the community and only one person thought that the City should sell the property to the church. Mr. Richardson commented that comparing the activity of the storage shed and the church were not the same.

Mayor Taylor commented that he did not know exactly what 2.3 acres was or how the road was going to go through in configuration to the property, but he felt that a few weeks were not going to kill the deal. Mayor Taylor stated that he did not have a problem with the sell, but would like to go out and see the amount of the property. Mayor Taylor added that he did not know what type of feedback he would get once this was in the press. Mr. Richardson explained that the church cannot build to the east because of Highway 61 and cannot build to the north because of the house and cannot build to the south because of Maple Street, so the only way to go is west. Mayor Taylor commented that he did not want to land lock the church. Mr. Richardson stated that if they would be land locked, there would be significant parking issues. Commissioner Peltier questioned if they were saying this was an all or nothing deal. Mr. Richardson answered that they were not saying that.

Commissioner Hlavachick explained that he had done some research and an acre is about the size of a football field, so this would be about two and a half football fields. Commissioner Hlavachick commented that he was beginning to agree with Commissioner Peltier in having the City retain the frontage property and do what we had originally intended to do. Commissioner Peltier commented that one of the advantages of this would be to get rid of the road to the cul-de-sac and use that for development and the church would have the back half of the lot. Commissioner Peltier stated that he was not sure that citizens were going to be very happy if we get rid of what was meant to help reduce taxes and increase development.

Mayor Taylor questioned how the plating was coming along. City Manager Howard commented that it should be done by the end of February and clarified that the plat was developed out of the design of the road. Mr. Howard stated that the farther west you go on this lot the more triangular shape it gets and would be less accommodating to the use for what the City’s purposes were. Mr. Richardson commented that the City could still accomplish the building on the property that remains. Mr. Richardson stated that he would ask that the Commission recognize the intangible benefits of the church and that not everything we do is about dollars and church expansion is important to the community.

Rev. Fleener commented to the Commission that there were no current building plans, but there was no other direction for growth other than this property. Rev. Fleener explained that this property may accommodate a multi-purpose facility, a gym, or a new sanctuary that seats 750 people, so when you figure in parking and easements, 2.3 acres is not that much. Rev. Fleener explained that in visiting with the City Manager, the 2.3 acres came about due to the shape of the road. Rev. Fleener commented that 125 years ago, the City Commission donated land to the churches and that they understood the value of them to the community. Rev. Fleener stated that this was the only land that would allow them to grow without relocating. Rev. Fleener reminded the Commission that in 2009, then Mayor Nystrom stated that the City would not hinder the growth of a church, but by dividing this land in half, it would hinder that growth.

Mayor Taylor tabled this item until the next meeting and asked the Commission to come back with an answer. Mayor Taylor commented that they may hear more public input before then to help make their decision. Commissioner Nystrom commented that he had not had this much public response since the portable generator issue. Commissioner Peltier asked what Commissioner Graf was thinking about this sell. Commissioner Graf commented that he thought we should sell it to the church. Commissioner Graf added that they had come and asked, so we should work with them. Mayor Taylor stated that this item would be on the agenda again at the next meeting.

DISCUSSION WITH PRMC CONCERNING NEW FACILITY:

Mr. Rich Sanders addressed the Commission and informed them that he was the Chairman of the Pratt County Hospital Board, not the President of the Board of Directors. Mr. Sanders stated that the Hospital Board was appointed by the County and serves as the County’s representative for the hospital facilities. Mr. Sanders stated that the Board was charged with serving as the County’s representative and landlord and also to maintain the facilities and property.

Mayor Taylor questioned what the lease payment was for the hospital. Mr. Sanders stated that for the last ten years, the lease fee was structured around the hospital making the bond payment and currently that was around $900,000. Mayor Taylor asked if the buildings remain the property of the County as long as they were making payments. Mr. Sanders stated that they are making those payments in lieu of a lease payment. Mr. Sanders added that the bonds have about seven more years on them.

Mr. Sanders commented that he had been on the Board for over twenty years and during that time, the mill levy to support the funding of the structures had been ¾ of a mill. Mr. Sanders explained that for most of those years that had been less than $100,000 and virtually all the funding had come from the operations of the hospital. Mr. Sanders stated that anticipating some things on the horizon, their mill levy increased to 1.25 or approximately $150,000.

Mr. Sanders explained that two years ago, they noticed that the structure was aging and it was apparent that something was going to have to be done to keep the hospital a vital part of the community. Mr. Sanders stated that the hospital was built in 1948, the patient wing was added in 1961 and the emergency room was expanded in 1981. Mr. Sanders added that the hospital was designed for medicine in 1948 and, with small rooms, today’s equipment does not always fit through the doorway and there was a community shower room since a majority of the rooms did not have showers. Mr. Sanders commented that there are major issues with the plumbing, heating and electrical along with a thirty year old boiler. Mr. Sanders explained that with today’s codes, you have to replace a boiler; which can take six to nine months.

Mr. Sanders stated that cost estimates came back at $22 million to update the mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems in the current facility, but that left the facility long on in-patient rooms, short on out-patient rooms, and the emergency room would continue to be grossly inadequate. Mr. Sanders commented that after some negotiating, the new construction cost went from $40/$45 million to $26 million. Mr. Sanders explained that that involved an 80,000 square foot structure and the retention of two existing structures. Mr. Sanders pointed out that this would be a one story facility and to utilize the existing facility the Complex would house administrative functions and dietary preparations. Mr. Sanders stated that the new facility would have thirty-six in-patient rooms and an emergency room three and a half times the size of the current one.

Mr. Sanders stated that the Board and the County were unanimous in that they did not want property tax used as a way to help finance the new facility. Mr. Sanders explained that the hospital could handle $1.2 to $1.5 million maximum per year. Mr. Sanders commented that the current outstanding bond issue was approximately $5 million and the not to exceed budget for the new construction was set at $34 million. Mr. Sanders explained that, on a $34 million bond issue, it yields a payment range of $2.6/$2.7 million. Commissioner Peltier asked if this was a fifteen or twenty year bond. Mr. Sanders answered that it was a twenty-five year bond.

Mr. Sanders stated that current interest rates were attractive and that was why they decided to move now. Mr. Sanders explained that the bonds would be issued through the Public Building Commission, which functions through the County. Mr. Sanders commented that the bonds are backed by the County and in a worst case scenario, that would mean the taxpayers would have to back the bonds also.

Mr. Sanders stated that their proposal was for a one percent sales tax that would fund the shortfall of what the hospital could pay and the bond payment. Mr. Sanders stated that the average revenue of a one percent sales tax is $1.7 million plus the $1.2/$1.5 from the hospital would be approximately $2.9 to $3.2 million in revenue; which is more than the forecasted bond payment. Mr. Sanders explained that the excess revenue would go into a third level reserve account. Mr. Sanders commented that the hospital currently has excess revenues they have been able to develop over the years in the amount of $6 million and this would be the first stop gap if there were shortfalls and the second source would be the excess sales tax. Mr. Sanders stated that the County Hospital Board also has funds set aside of around $1 million and would be used as a third source.

Mr. Sanders commented that sales tax would be the best way to finance the new facility due to a large percentage of patients being from all over and that means that families spend money in Pratt; whether for food or lodging. Commissioner Peltier questioned what percentage of patients were from out of town. Mr. Sanders answered that it was about forty percent.

Mr. Sanders stated that this was a good time to look at a new facility with interest rates being down and construction costs were low. Mr. Sanders informed the Commission that they would be getting the word out through hospital personnel, board members and intensive public education in preparation for the April ballot. Mr. Howard commented that the construction project would boost the economy and could help pay for their own project. Mayor Taylor commented that at the City/County joint meeting, it was discussed that a new facility would help retain the current doctors and also bring in new ones. Ms. Susan Page commented that a new facility would be a recruiting factor. Mayor Taylor commented that this was a good time with low interest rates and low construction costs. Mayor Taylor added that they need to educate the community so that they do not loose what they have. Ms. Page stated that the hospital was the largest employer in Pratt County and those employees contribute to the economics of the community. Commissioner Nystrom commented that if the sales tax issue passes, the cost is divided up by 50,000 to 60,000 people and if it fails and major renovations are done, it is only about 9,000 people. Commissioner Nystrom added that this was not going to go away, but we could shift the burden for taxpayers.

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE CEMETERY BOARD:

Public Works Director Russell Rambat informed the Commission that two seats on the cemetery board were to expire soon. Mr. Rambat stated that Mr. Terry Gatlin and Ms. Lori Jones had been contacted to see if they would be interested in another term and Mr. Gatlin was not due to family obligations, but Ms. Jones would be able to serve an additional three year term. Mr. Rambat commented that Ms. Jones had contacted Ms. Tony Graven Mantey about being on the board and she was very interested. Commissioner Hlavachick commented that he had spoken to Mr. Gatlin and he had said that more children’s activities occupy his time, but had learned a lot being on this board.

A motion by Commissioner Hlavachick to appoint Ms. Tony Graven Mantey and Ms. Lori Jones to three year terms on the cemetery board. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nystrom and carried unanimously.

REPORTS:

City Manager:

• Letter from Dr. Davis:

City Manager Howard informed the Commission that he was looking into the school’s situation along with Director of Electric Utilities Kelly Hemphill. Mr. Howard stated that there should be something to report back to the Commission as soon as possible and he assured them that they were looking at every possibility.

City Attorney:

• Term Limit Petition:

City Attorney Ken Van Blaricum commented that there had been a term limit petition handed into the County Clerk Sherry Kruse. Mr. Van Blaricum stated that the petition asks that a City Commissioner serve two consecutive three year terms then set out for four years before holding the office again.

Mr. Van Blaricum stated that Ms. Karen Detwiler had handed the City Clerk (*see note below) the petition sometime in 2008 and she in turn gave it to the County Counselor Gordon Stull for a legal opinion as to whether it was a sufficient petition. Mr. Van Blaricum commented that he had not seen the written opinion from Mr. Stull, but it was determined to be a legally sufficient petition.

Mr. Van Blaricum informed the Commission that, in his research on petitions and term limits, he had found an Attorney General’s opinion in 1994 on a petition for term limits that was circulated in Lawrence, KS. Mr. Van Blaricum explained that the petition was presented to the City, who inquired of the City Attorney as to whether it was a valid petition. Mr. Van Blaricum commented that the City Attorney did not feel that it was; therefore, he turned to the Kansas Attorney General who ruled that the petition was not good enough. Mr. Van Blaricum explained that the Attorney General stated that there was an extra paragraph that the Attorney General felt would have directed the City to encourage Congress to impose term limits on federal officials.

Mr. Van Blaricum commented that the petition before this Commission on term limits was the same petition that was circulated in Lawrence minus the paragraph that the Attorney General did not like. Mayor Taylor questioned what their terms were. Mr. Van Blaricum answered that they were two four year consecutive terms and no more than three terms regardless of the length of the terms. Mayor Taylor questioned that the four year waiting was adopted from Lawrence. Mr. Van Blaricum stated yes. Mayor Taylor commented that it does not make much sense why you would set out for four years when you are serving three year terms. Mr. Van Blaricum commented that that explains why that was in there since it was directly derived from the Lawrence petition.

Mr. Van Blaricum explained that the statutory back ground on this is that if forty percent of the electors that voted in the last election sign the petition, it is a good petition. Mr. Van Blaricum commented that once that happens, the City Commission has two options. Mr. Van Blaricum stated that those options would be for the Commission to pass an ordinance without alterations within twenty days after attachment of the clerk’s certificate to the petition or if not passed within twenty days, call a special election, unless a regular City election is to be held within ninety days thereafter, and at such special or regular City election submit the ordinance, without alteration, to the vote of the electors of the City. Mr. Van Blaricum stated that an ordinance in the form of a petition has been signed by the appropriate number of voters, approved by the County Election Officer and the County Counselor, but that petition should be filed with the City Clerk, which has not been done yet.

Mr. Van Blaricum stated that there was another State statute that talks about whether the ordinance was in proper form and that was something that had been discussed before. Mr. Van Blaricum commented that Mr. Stull believes that this petition is in proper form, as did the Attorney General in 1994 and although he had not had time to study it, he was in agreement. Mr. Van Blaricum explained that the only other option would be to oppose it in court and he stated that he did not see any grounds for that.

Mr. Van Blaricum pointed out that, as in the 1994 petition circulated in Lawrence, the ordinance specifically states that the service of a City Commissioner prior to the adoption of this section shall not count for determining length of service. Mr. Van Blaricum commented that that means that all present Commissioners would start over again with their terms and that this would not come into play for another six years after the adoption of the ordinance.

Commissioner Hlavachick questioned if Mr. Van Blaricum knew the results of the Lawrence petition. Mr. Van Blaricum stated that it was never submitted due to the veto of the Attorney General. Mr. Van Blaricum commented that there were some Cities that have term limits, but he did not know how many. Commissioner Hlavachick stated that he had called the League of Kansas Municipalities and they do not know of any Cities our size with term limits.

Mr. Van Blaricum explained that whether this ordinance was adopted by election or by the Commission, it could not be repealed for ten years without a vote of the public. Mayor Taylor questioned what the Commission needed to do. Mr. Van Blaricum stated that the Commission needs to decide whether or not to adopt this within twenty days after it has been submitted or let it go on the ballot at the next general election.

*Note: City Attorney did state ‘City’ not ‘County’

Public Works:

• Snow removal:

Public Works Director Rambat commented that the street department had done a good job with snow removal and that, with the timing of the snow, they did not have to worry about the school zones. Mr. Rambat stated that City personnel and hired hands had put in two hundred ninety-four man hours from midnight Friday to last evening and used ten tons of salt and sand.

Inspections:

• Three bids for three jobs:


City Inspector Blankenship commented that he would have three different bids for three different jobs at the fire station for the Commission to review at the next meeting. Mr. Blankenship explained that the jobs were for plumbing for the south inside bathroom and kitchen, the concrete pour to get all of it on one level and the ceiling in the bay area. Commissioner Nystrom asked what was being used on the ceiling. Mr. Blankenship commented that it would be a dry wall acoustical drop-in and tectum that is a 2 X 8 sheet that is one inch thick with noise absorption. Mr. Blankenship commented that these can be painted up to six times and the idea had come from the City of Pittsburg’s fire station.

Recreation:

• Pine Wilt issue:

Recreation Director Pinkall commented that he had visited with Mr. Mark Eckhoff, park superintendent, about the pine wilt issue and they would be working with the Tree Board on this as well.

Police:

• Candidates packets:

Police Chief Holmes commented that he had delivered the candidate’s packets last week and some of them were not home. Chief Holmes asked that if they need them delivered to a different address to please let him know.

Commission:

• Pigeons:

Commissioner Hlavachick commented that there was a pigeon problem again and he was not sure if the Extension office had anything new on controlling them. Commissioner Hlavachick added that they are bad around the Sears building. Mr. Howard commented that he had tried to contact Mr. Don Prosser, but could not get hold of him. Mr. Rambat stated that he had visited with the owner of Sears and let them know that we were working on it.

• Contractor’s license:

Commissioner Peltier asked if there had been anything done about contractor’s licenses. Mr. Blankenship stated that he was working on that.

• Local suppliers:

Commissioner Peltier commented that if they build the new hospital, he would like to encourage them to use local suppliers. Commissioner Peltier stated that the college dorm project did not get a quote from one of the local lumber yards.

ADJOURN:

A motion by Commissioner Hlavachick to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nystrom and carried unanimously.


____________________________________
JEFF TAYLOR, Mayor


(SEAL)

ATTEST:

__________________________________
LUANN KRAMER, City Clerk

02/01/10-Approved City/County meeting minutes

MONDAY

FEBRUARY 01, 2010

The Governing Body of the City of Pratt met in Regular session in the Commission Room located in City Hall.

PRESENT: Jeff Taylor Mayor
Bill Hlavachick Commissioner
Eric Nystrom Commissioner
Willy Peltier Commissioner
Victor Graf Commissioner

ALSO PRESENT: Dave Howard City Manager
LuAnn Kramer City Clerk
Ken Van Blaricum City Attorney
Joe Reynolds County Commissioner
Charles Rinke County Commissioner
Dwight Adams County Commissioner
Sherry Kruse County Clerk
Gordon Stull County Counselor


CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Taylor called the regular meeting to order. The Mayor instructed the Clerk to note that all Commissioners were present.

BUSINESS:

GENERAL DISCUSSION ON CITY/COUNTY ISSUES:

Hospital issue:

Mayor Taylor opened the discussion informing the County Commissioners that Ms. Susan Page and Mr. Rich Sanders would be at the regular meeting tonight to talk about the hospital project. Mayor Taylor added that this was a topic that was out in the community and wanted to know the feelings of the County. County Commissioner Rinke commented they had visited with the bond company and the hospital and they were steering clear of any answers right now, because the taxpayers were going to be the ones to tell them what they are going to do.

Mayor Taylor asked how this was going to affect them as far as the bonds that they guarantee or if these two were disassociated. Mayor Taylor also questioned what would happen if they could not service the new bond with a sales tax and what affect that would have on the other bonds. County Counselor Stull commented that they were not refinancing the old bond because they were not recallable and the payment for the old bond would be wrapped around the payment system of the new one. Mr. Stull added that the sales tax and lease payment would be used to pay off the old bond. Commissioner Peltier questioned how much longer they have on the old bond. Mr. Stull commented that he thought it was six or seven years.

Commissioner Nystrom questioned if the bonds outstanding now were for the complex. Mr. Stull stated that was correct. Mayor Taylor questioned if the bonds were just guaranteed, but not refinanced. Mr. Stull stated that was right and that they did it because they saved about a million dollars.

Commissioner Peltier commented that he had heard that the hospital was asking for a $.08 sales tax increase with no sunset. Mr. Stull stated that the question was going to be for one cent and would sunset when the bond is paid off in twenty-five years. County Commissioner Adams commented that medical is the only way they can do this.

Commissioner Peltier asked if the hospital was responsible for part of the bond payment and the sales tax would be for the rest. Mr. Stull explained that the hospital would have a lease agreement that would take care of at least half of the bond debt and if they do not have it, they would use their reserves that they have built up. Commissioner Nystrom asked if they had gone with Piper Jeffries. Mr. Stull stated that they did. Mr. Stull explained that the hospital has a reserve and operations reserve fund. Mayor Taylor questioned how much that was. Commissioner Adams stated that it was about $6 million.

Mayor Taylor questioned if the hospital was required by law to show anyone their financial statement. Mr. Stull answered that they were not by law, but by practicality, they would with this issue. Mayor Taylor asked if they were audited. Mr. Stull stated that they were. Mayor Taylor questioned if it was made public. Mr. Stull stated that it has not been, because the open records act, with relationship of lease or leasee, does not require them to make it open. Mr. Stull added that they do provide a summary to the board and they do get a copy of the audit.

Mayor Taylor questioned whether or not there was going to be a mill levy increase to help pay for the County hospital unless something goes wrong. Mr. Stull commented that this may eliminate the need for a mill levy increase for the hospital board, because they would not have as much in maintenance and repairs as in the past. Mayor Taylor asked what the total of the bond was going to be. County Commissioner Reynolds answered that it was around $26 million with construction.

City Manager Dave Howard commented that, at one time, they had talked to him about closing Third Street and he had told Ms. Page that would not be a good idea. Mr. Howard explained that that would divert a lot of traffic to Sixth Street and that could cause safety issues.

Commissioner Nystrom asked if Mr. Stull would explain the hospital management. Mr. Stull explained that the County, represented by the Commission, owns the property and, by statute, can be handled by a Board of Trustees that is appointed by the County Commission. Commissioner Nystrom asked who was on the Board of Trustees. Mr. Stull stated that Mr. Rich Sanders, Mr. Phil Schrack, Mr. Gary Barker, Mr. Ross Hoener and Mr. Jack Galle were on the board. Mr. Stull commented that their options are to manage the hospital themselves, enter into a management agreement or they can lease it to somebody.

Mr. Stull explained that some time ago, it was a County operated hospital and the Sisters of St. Joseph managed it for them for many years. Mr. Stull commented that there began to be some dissention about how that was going and some felt that the Sisters of St. Joseph were utilizing Pratt as an arm of their bigger facility in Wichita by dictating where they bought supplies, etc. Mr. Stull explained that was found not very cost effective, so it was proposed to do a different form of management. Mr. Stull stated that there was a study done for the County on their options and one option was to create an independent third party not-for-profit corporation and all their money and equipment was put into Pratt Regional Medical Center. Mr. Stull commented that the initial board was appointed by the County Commission; therefore, there was no longer any direct control between the County and PRMC on the operation of the hospital. Mr. Stull added that this made it so the County would never be responsible for any shortfalls, but PRMC had access to the capital and if they were ever out of business, it goes back to the County and the community.

Mr. Stull explained that they have paid off two bond issues and currently are paying on the bond for the tower. Mr. Stull stated that the County’s share had been minimal, but recently the maintenance repairs had become so extensive that the County had been paying more. Mr. Stull commented that this was a PRMC generated recommendation. Commissioner Peltier questioned that the maintenance was becoming an issue. Mr. Stull stated that it was and that they have had trouble with the Fire Marshall and the boiler was a big problem. Commissioner Peltier commented that the Fire Marshall’s office plays by the letter of the law. Mr. Stull commented that there is no gray area with them. Commissioner Nystrom clarified that everything in the building belongs to PRMC. Mr. Stull stated that was correct and they also have their own profits and gifts and bequests. Commissioner Nystrom asked if the 1.2 mills goes to capital improvement. Mr. Stull stated that it was in the Board of Trustees budget for capital improvements.

Commissioner Peltier questioned the term for the board. Mr. Stull stated that there was not a term limit and that the members were appointed by the board itself. Commissioner Nystrom asked if Ms. Susan Page works for them. Mr. Stull stated that she does.

Commissioner Hlavachick questioned how much land belonged with PRMC. Mr. Stull explained that they own from Highway 54 to Third Street, from the pool to Howard Street and had bought land on Third Street to use for parking along with the vacant lot behind Lanterman Motors.

Commissioner Hlavachick questioned when they would be putting in the parking lot. Mr. Stull commented he was not sure. Commissioner Nystrom commented that they may talk about that tonight. County Commissioner Adams commented that they would probably talk about the financing and the sales tax issue with the election coming up and wanting it on the ballot. Mayor Taylor asked if the County was the one that would allow them to do the County wide sales tax. Commissioner Rinke stated that was correct. Mayor Taylor commented that this was going to be a tough sale. Commissioner Nystrom commented that it was more controversial than you would think it would have been. Commissioner Hlavachick commented that the State had not decided what they were going to do with their one cent yet.

School issue:

Mr. Howard commented that Pratt had not seen the economic downturn yet although the sales tax was down about four percent. Mr. Howard added that the school cut backs are part of the economic downfall and this was what was happening nationwide. Commissioner Peltier commented that school financing was messed up, because the money that we pour into it cannot be used in the general fund. Commissioner Peltier added that the State’s money is used to pay the teachers, etc. and the money in capital outlay cannot be used to help manage the other issues. Mayor Taylor commented that schools in the past could run in the black and keep some of that, but in the last five to eight years, it has been spend it or lose it. Mayor Taylor added that if you are given money, you are going to spend it and the State has forced schools to add programs without looking forward to lean years. Mayor Taylor stated that he feels that the State had created a welfare state with the schools.

Landfill ground:

Commissioner Hlavachick questioned if the County would allow a shooting range on some of the landfill ground. Commissioner Adams commented that it had been discussed for the Sheriff’s Department, but they had gotten a lot of feedback. Commissioner Hlavachick commented that he would check into it further, but that Hays had a program where the landfill lent itself and had the berms already in place. Commissioner Rinke commented that KDHE would frown on the berms.

Health department:

Commissioner Nystrom questioned what affect the hospital would have on the Health Department. Mr. Stull stated that they were a creature of State Statute and a new hospital would not diminish the role of the County Health Department. Mr. Stull stated that they are funded by revenues generated and mill levy. Mayor Taylor asked if they could be located at the new hospital. Mr. Stull commented that the Health Department wanted to stay independent.

Selling new hospital to community:

Commissioner Nystrom questioned how they were going to sell the new hospital to the community even though it was not the County’s obligation. Mr. Stull commented that, one way or another, the County as a whole was going to have to decide what is done about a medical facility. Commissioner Nystrom commented that there would be expenses no matter what. Mr. Stull stated that there was unless you close the facility down and there are mandates that we own a hospital and run it. Mr. Stull commented that if repairs are what is decided, it would be by mill levy. Commissioner Nystrom asked if that was part of their strategy. Commissioner Reynolds stated that it better be. Mr. Stull added that repairs would be around $10 to $12 million dollars.

Mr. Stull commented that their proposal was a way to maximize the possibility that there would not be an increase in ad volerum taxes. Commissioner Adams commented that there are other options before shutting it down. Commissioner Nystrom commented that no one wants that and a no vote on the sales tax issue does not make it go away. Mr. Stull stated that one benefit of this is that ad volerum is born by the County and the other is by the people who use the hospital, by direct payment and by sales tax if they come from another County. Mr. Howard commented that bonding companies fifteen years ago would not do issues involving sales tax, because it was not a reliable source of income.

Lease payment for hospital:

Mayor Taylor questioned what the lease payment was for the hospital. Mr. Stull commented that he thought it was $2.8 million annually with half being hospital and half being sales tax. Mr. Stull added that any excess was put into reserves.

Ethanol Plant:

Commissioner Nystrom questioned if there was anything new about the Ethanol Plant. Mr. Stull commented that they were getting closer to finalizing the bankruptcy and there were several potential buyers. Mr. Stull added that he was told that they had brought in replacement boilers and took theirs out. Mayor Taylor commented that they have continued to make their payment to the City for the waterline. Mr. Stull commented that they were also making their payment to them for the road.

ADJOURN:

A motion by Commissioner Hlavachick to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nystrom and carried unanimously.


_______________________________________
JEFF TAYLOR, Mayor


(SEAL)

ATTEST:

____________________________________
LUANN KRAMER, City Clerk

Friday, February 12, 2010

02/15/2010 City Commission Agenda

MONDAY

FEBRUARY 15, 2010

PRATT CITY COMMISSION – REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING

COMMISSION ROOM – 5:00 P.M.

1. CALL TO ORDER (Remind audience that meeting is being recorded and/or taped.)

2. ROLL CALL

3. MINUTES – February 01, 2010 Regular City/County Commission meeting
February 01, 2010 Regular City Commission meeting

4. OPEN AGENDA

5. BUSINESS:

5.1 Consideration and Approval of Use of Property for PCC/City of Pratt Soccer Field – Kurt McAfee, PCC; Bruce Pinkall, Recreation Director

5.2 Consideration and Approval of Bid for Street Portion of Maple Street Extension – Alan Luttrell, EBH Engineering; City Staff

5.3 Consideration and Approval of Bid for Waterline Relocation on Maple Street Extension – Alan Luttrell, EBH Engineering; City Staff

5.4 Consideration of the Sale of Property to Southern Baptist Church – Mayor and Commission; Ernie Richardson, Church Representative

5.5 Consideration and Approval of Bid for Plumbing on the Bathroom & Kitchen at New Fire Station – David Kramer, Fire Chief; Brad Blankenship, City Inspector

5.6 Consideration and Approval of Bid for Concrete on South Side of the New Fire Station – David Kramer, Fire Chief; Brad Blankenship, City Inspector

5.7 Consideration and Approval of Bid for Thermal Imaging Camera – David Kramer, Fire Chief

5.8 Consideration and Approval of Firm Energy & Load Following Agreement Between the City and KMEA – Kelly Hemphill, Dir. of Electric Utilities; Dave Howard, City Manager

5.9 Consideration and Approval of Resolution 021510 Authorizing the Execution of a Firm Energy Agreement Between the City and KMEA – Kelly Hemphill, Dir. of Electric Utilities; Dave Howard, City Manager

5.10 Consideration and Approval of Donation to South Central Kansas Community Corrections Agency – Dave Howard, City Manager

5.11 Discussion on Option to Term Limit Petition – Ken Van Blaricum, City Attorney

6. REPORTS

6.1 City Manager
6.2 City Attorney
6.3 Department Heads
6.4 Mayor
6.5 City Commission

7. ADJOURN

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

01/18/210 Approved City Commission minutes

MONDAY

JANUARY 18, 2010

The Governing Body of the City of Pratt met in Regular session in the Commission Room located in City Hall.

PRESENT: Jeff Taylor Mayor
Bill Hlavachick Commissioner
Eric Nystrom Commissioner
Willy Peltier Commissioner
Victor Graf Commissioner

ALSO PRESENT: Dave Howard City Manager
LuAnn Kramer City Clerk
Ken Van Blaricum City Attorney
Diana Garten Finance Director
Steve Holmes Chief of Police
Russell Rambat Public Works Director
Brad Blankenship Building Inspector
Kelly Hemphill Dir. of Electric Utilities

CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Taylor called the regular meeting to order. The Mayor instructed the Clerk to note that all Commissioners were present.

Mayor Taylor reminded the audience that the meeting may be taped and/or recorded.

MINUTES:

A motion by Commissioner Hlavachick to approve the minutes of the January 04, 2010 regular meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nystrom and carried unanimously.

OPEN AGENDA:

No one in the audience wished to address the Commission.

BUSINESS:

DISCUSSION ON SALE OF PROPERTY TO FIRST SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH:

City Manager Dave Howard pointed out the 2.3 acres that the First Southern Baptist Church was interested in purchasing from the City. Mr. Howard reminded the Commission that this was property that had been purchased from Mr. Blake Himmelwright. Mr. Howard commented that with the engineering being done on Maple Street, there were four lots that had been plated. Mr. Howard added that the church had expressed interest in purchasing this property from the very beginning. Mr. Howard stated that he had been asked by some of the Commissioners what cost the City had in this property and he explained that there was probably a minimal cost of around $500.

Mr. Ernie Richardson, church representative, then addressed the Commission on their desire to purchase this land. Mr. Richardson introduced Mr. Jerry Bohn and Rev. Bob Fleener to the Commission. Mr. Richardson stated that the church was still interested in purchasing the property Mr. Howard had discussed and pointed out that there were a number of benefits listed in the Commissioner’s packets that the church felt were important and also an article that had been printed in The Pratt Tribune last year that stated that several parcels of ground had been gifted to churches many years ago and the importance of that article was that the City recognizes the importance of churches in the community.

Mr. Richardson commented that the church was willing to pay a fair price for this property. Mr. Richardson stated that with their approximately five hundred members, a strong outreach to Pratt Community College, children ministries, involvement with South Wind Hospice and the hospital, they still had room to grow and would like to have room for a youth facility. Mr. Richardson commented that it was his understanding that the City had approximately $5,200 in one of the partials, which would make the purchasing amount $12,000, but the church would be willing to pay $15,000.

Commissioner Hlavachick commented that this would be a purchase for potential growth. Mr. Richardson stated that there was a church plan that needed to be updated that involved new facilities, but Rev. Fleerner could tell them more about that. Commissioner Peltier asked about a time table. Mr. Richardson commented that they did not have one except to obtain the property. Rev. Fleener commented that they would need to develop the mater site plan before they knew more. Commissioner Peltier questioned how long it might be before they use the property. Rev. Fleener commented that it could be less than five years. Mayor Taylor commented that, having served on church boards, you need to have the board and parishioners on the same page. Mayor Taylor stated that he was in favor of this sell and he was not trying to sway the other Commissioners’ decision. Mayor Taylor commented that his only concern was that, if several years down the road the church decided not to build, he would like to see the land come back to the City instead of being subdivided into lots, because the price that the City was asking was probably not close to what you could sell it for per lot. City Manager Howard commented that this was approximately eight lots and, if developed, the value could be from $6,000 for a higher density zoning and up to $10,000 for lower density per lot. Mr. Howard added that there would be developing costs that would have to be added in and that would include the cul-de-sac that would have to be built plus the plating of subdividing the lots. Mr. Howard commented that we were not along enough to do any type of design work for future development. Mayor Taylor commented that he felt the City would be better stewards of the property if we were to take the property back if the church decided they did not want it. Mr. Howard commented that it would be right of first refusal, but at what price. Mr. Richardson commented that the amount would probably be adjusted by inflation.

Commissioner Nystrom questioned if a convenience store could build to the south of the church if they sold 3.2 beer. City Attorney Ken Van Blaricum commented that he thought they could not build up to 1,000 feet of a church. Commissioner Nystrom asked if the church would allow them to proceed if this were the case.

Commissioner Peltier questioned if there would be issues if we sold the church the 2.3 acres for X amount of dollars and then turned around and sold a lot for the same amount of money. Mr. Van Blaricum stated that that was not a legal issue, but more of a practical issue. Mayor Taylor commented that if someone came in to buy a parcel of land, the City would have to add specials to make it accessible to Maple Street. Commissioner Nystrom cleared up that the City was not doing anything to improve the property at this time.

Mr. Howard commented that a convenience store was not addressed in the ordinance, but we would want to do more research. Police Chief Steve Holmes commented that a bar would be a different issue if more than 50% of their retail sales were from food. Commissioner Nystrom asked if there were any zoning issues to the west of that property. Mr. Richardson commented that the church would be happy to get the property. Mr. Howard commented that churches are an easy transition in zoning.

Commissioner Graf was asked what his thoughts were and he wanted to think on it and find out where we were on the liquor issue. Commissioner Nystrom questioned if someone would be denied a 3.2 malt license because of footage from the church. Rev. Fleener asked what difference that makes in the church purchasing the property. Commissioner Nystrom commented that his question was whether the church would have a problem with that and wondered if, down the road, a new pastor would feel different about that issue. Rev. Fleener commented that he was not ready to answer that, but wanted to know if what he was hearing concerning the liquor license issue was if they did object, then they would not be sold the property. Commissioner Nystrom stated that that was not correct and this was just a point of information.

Mr. Howard commented that the Public Works Director and he had looked at other issues such as easements, sewer and water lines and there appears that we would not need any easements along that property. Mr. Howard added that the City would have a right-of-way on the southern edge. Commissioner Nystrom questioned if Maple Street was of vital interest to the church. Mr. Howard commented that it would be an anchor to that area. Mr. Richardson only agreed that it would make it easier for people to get to the church.

Mayor Taylor stated that the sale of this property would be taken up again at the next meeting.

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF A NEW THERMAL IMAGING CAMERA:

Mayor Taylor commented that Chief Kramer had been delayed at work and this item would be discussed when he arrived.

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF A NEW SANITATION TRUCK:

Public Works Director Russell Rambat commented that this was the truck that he had discussed at the last meeting and the best option was to buy new and not used. Mr. Rambat explained that the sanitation department currently had a 2006 and a 2007 packer truck. Mr. Rambat stated that option 2 from Downing Sales and Service was for a 2009 Sterling Acterra cab with a 20 yard Cobra packer and that was slightly misleading as it did have a new chassis and cab.

Mr. Rambat commented that there were benefits to this as it was not of the 2010 emission compliance requirements, so there was less equipment on it. Mr. Rambat stated that his recommendation would be option two for $114,460, even though it was $678 higher than option one. Mr. Rambat explained that Downing Sales and Service was not interested in the old unit, but offered $1,000 for trade-in. Mr. Rambat commented that he had gotten the bids in 2009, so half of the dollars would come from 2009 with the remaining coming from 2010 funds. Mr. Rambat added that this would not completely drain the equipment reserve fund.

Commissioner Nystrom asked if there were any parts value to the City like tires, wheels or hydraulics. Mr. Rambat commented that the other option would be to go out for local bids and maybe a smaller city would be interested. Commissioner Graf commented that he would like to see the City hold onto the truck as he knew of a guy that was interested in it. Mayor Taylor reminded Commissioner Graf that he would have to go through the bid process. Mr. Rambat stated that he could have it published in the paper for sealed bids and a cutoff date for them to be turned in along with the right to accept or reject any bid that comes in under the $1,000.

A motion by Commissioner Nystrom to purchase a 2009 Sterling Acterra with a 20 yard Cobra packer for $114,460 from Downing Sales and Service. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Graf and carried unanimously.

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF A NEW THERMAL IMAGING CAMERA:

Mayor Taylor returned to this agenda item as Fire Chief Kramer had arrived. Chief Kramer apologized for being late to the meeting, but he had been in Medicine Lodge on a job. Chief Kramer informed the Commission that he had received new information on a camera and he would need more time to look into it. Chief Kramer commented that one of the companies had not gotten the incorrect e-mail address and had not been able to get him a quote, but due to a substantial price difference he felt that he would like to look at the camera before making any decision.

After little more discussion, Chief Kramer stated that he would formally rebid the camera and bring it back to the Commission.

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL ON REPAIRS TO CITY WATER WELL #13 BY LAYNE WESTERN:

Water Superintendent Kelvin Clay informed the Commission that Well #13 near Maple Street had gravel and sand in it. Mr. Clay stated that it was ruining our equipment and that after a video inspection, it was determined that there were column pipe problems. Mr. Clay explained that the well had been off line since early November.

Mr. Clay commented that Layne Western recommended replacing the pipe and in doing that you cannot touch the side of the concrete casing. Mr. Howard explained that the reason we were not going out for bid was because if another company got the bid, they would rely on this company’s inspection. Mr. Clay commented that Layne Western was right in the ball park on pricing at $11,962 plus tax.

A motion by Commissioner Nystrom to approve the bid from Layne Western of $11,962 plus any applicable sales tax to repair Well #13. The motion was second by Commissioner Hlavachick and carried unanimously.

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 0903 (SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES):

City Attorney Van Blaricum commented that the smoking ordinance had been reviewed at the last meeting concerning establishments allowing smoking from 10:30 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. and the provision that it expire on January 04, 2010. Mr. Van Blaricum stated that the ordinance before the Commission tonight would delete the last language of Section G (2). Commissioner Peltier expressed his concern for servers that would be subjected to the smoking environment and he stated, ‘We are not doing our job as Commissioners if are not protecting the health and well being of our citizens’. Mayor Taylor commented that these hours are limited and hopefully could be worked around.

Commissioner Nystrom commented that employees accept the job knowing the risks. Mr. Van Blaricum commented that the current ordinance requires employers to not let employees work in those areas. Commissioner Peltier stated that that was not practical. Mayor Taylor commented that he appreciates the way it is and the City does not want to be more restrictive than the State. Commissioner Peltier explained that he had asked some owners if it had hurt their business and they said that it was hard to judge with the economic situation the way it is. Commissioner Peltier commented that we did have ‘high tide’ with the new school construction, the Ethanol Plant and wind mill workers in town. Commissioner Hlavachick commented that he has appreciated no smoking while he was eating.

The following Ordinance 1001 was then presented to the Commission for their approval: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION G (2) OF THE PROHIBITION OF SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES SECTION OF ORDINANCE 0903 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF PRATT; PROVIDING FOR SMOKING IN DESIGNATED AREAS OF RESTAURANTS AND LICENSED PREMISES DURING CERTAIN HOURS. A motion by Commissioner Hlavachick to approve Ordinance 1001 that amends section G (2) of Ordinance 0903 dealing with the prohibition of smoking in public places. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nystrom and carried with four approved votes and one opposed vote by Commissioner Peltier.

REPORTS:

City Manager:

• Bids on Maple Street

Mr. Howard commented that the City Engineers would be going out for bid on the Maple Street project with a closing date of February 11th. Mr. Howard stated that they would be on the February 15th agenda.

• Tap changer off line

Mr. Howard explained to the Commission that the tap changer had gone off line twice last week. Mr. Howard commented that this was a well planned project and that it was not that long ago that #7 was torn apart and now we were relying on it. Mr. Howard extended congratulations to the Power Plant employees for a job well done and apologized for the City being without power for that period of time.

Inspections:

• Fire station update

City Inspector Brad Blankenship commented that they would be going out for bids in the next couple of weeks for the bathroom and the ceiling in the bay area at the new fire station. Mr. Blankenship stated that he should have that for the Commission in the next couple of meetings.

Electric:

• Fairbanks

Director of Electric Utilities Kelly Hemphill informed the Commission that a Fairbanks technician had been at the Power Plant working on #7 and he felt that all the bugs were ironed out. Mr. Hemphill added that we were still waiting on one cylinder head, but we were ready for summer usage.

Finance:

• Auditors

Finance Director Diana Garten commented that the auditors would be here on January 26th to do some preliminary work. Ms. Garten informed the Commission that they have scheduled the audit for the week of April 20th.

City Clerk/Utility Billing:

• Phone calls

City Clerk LuAnn Kramer commented that during the power outage the girls at City Hall worked non-stop answering phone calls. Ms. Kramer added that she had stayed after 5:00 p.m. along with Mr. Rambat and Ms. Angie Branscom to assure that everyone who should have electricity did.

Commission:

• Petition for term limits

Commissioner Peltier asked Commissioner Graf to explain the petition for term limits that he had heard that he was carrying around. Commissioner Graf stated that when he ran for Commission, he ran on wanting to see term limits. Commissioner Graf explained that you could be able to serve two terms or six years and then have to be off for four years. Commissioner Graf commented that this was to put it on the ballot so the people of Pratt could vote on it.

Commissioner Peltier asked if Commissioner Graf did not see any benefits of having Commissioner Hlavachick and Mayor Taylor on the Commission. Commissioner Graf stated that this was what some people had asked him to do and he was doing it. Commissioner Peltier stated that he had not answered the question. Commissioner Graf stated that he thought that we need other people on the Commission. Mayor Taylor commented that they have the opportunity to run and term limits are the fact that you can be voted out of office or if you feel that you cannot commit to the City, you have made that decision or the public can make it for you.

Mayor Taylor stated that there are term limits already out there and some Commissioners have found that out. Mayor Taylor commented that he felt that in the first three years as a Commissioner you are just getting your feet wet and after six years you are starting to be a good Commissioner. Commissioner Graf agreed. Mayor Taylor explained that having been here, he had seen other Commissioners bloom after their first term and start to get better in their second term and really flourish after that. Mayor Taylor commented that if the petition gets enough signatures to be voted on, he hopes that the City look at the years of experience as invaluable. Mayor Taylor stated that you learn this running a business, because you want employees to stay with your company for years. Mayor Taylor commented that he would not like to see someone on the Commission for two terms and leave, because you have not begun to learn all the aspects of what it takes to help a City to grow. Commissioner Nystrom commented that the League does not favor term limits and he agreed with Mayor Taylor in that it takes years to learn the ins and outs of the City. Commissioner Peltier commented that the longer serving members of the Commission have a great perspective on decisions and they know things. Commissioner Peltier stated that this was a $28 million corporation and you do not want to get rid of a good person because they have served six years.

Commissioner Nystrom stated that this was ultimately a Commission decision and this was a public survey they were taking. Commissioner Nystrom repeated that the Commission makes the decision as to whether there are term limits or not. Commissioner Peltier asked what happens if it comes up for a vote. Commissioner Nystrom repeated again that the Commission decides. Mayor Taylor asked if this was done through an ordinance. Commissioner Nystrom stated that it was by way of State Statute. Mayor Taylor asked Mr. Van Blaricum if that was correct. Mr. Van Blaricum commented that he would have to check into it. Mayor Taylor added that would help them out also to know if they are circulating a valid petition.

Commissioner Peltier said that he had heard that this was going around and wanted to know what it was. Commissioner Peltier asked why Commissioner Graf had not brought it to the Commission first. Commissioner Graf stated that when he ran, that was what he ran on. Commissioner Peltier stated ‘okay’.

Mayor Taylor recognized Ms. Karen Detwiler. Ms. Detwiler stated that they had checked into this thoroughly and the Commission would have an opportunity to adopt it, if not, it goes on the ballot. Another audience member stated that she was getting her masters and had taken a lot of classes in this and research shows that after awhile it gets to a point of self interest. She continued stating that many City Managers think that term limits are a good idea and that she completely believes in voting and the petition was a good idea. The audience member stated that if the City adopts it, the Commission should support what the City decides.

ADJOURN:

A motion by Commissioner Hlavachick to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Peltier and carried unanimously.



________________________________
JEFF TAYLOR, Mayor



(SEAL)

ATTEST:


_____________________________
LUANN KRAMER, City Clerk