Thursday, August 30, 2018

09/04/2018-City Commission Meeting Agenda


 TUESDAY
 
SEPTEMBER 04, 2018

PRATT CITY COMMISSION – REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING

COMMISSION ROOM – 5:00 P.M.
1.      CALL TO ORDER (Remind the audience that meeting is being recorded and/or taped.)
2.      ROLL CALL
3.      INVOCATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.   CONSENT AGENDA:
      4.1 Minutes:           August 20, 2018 Regular Commission Meeting
                                                                                                                                 
5.   BUSINESS:
5.1 Consideration and Approval for Use of Merchant Park and to Close 4th Street to the Alley  from 5:00 pm to 8 pm on September 20, 2018 – Scott Goodheart, PCC 

5.2 Continued Discussion on Changes to Ordinance 0503 Dealing with Travel and Tourism – Kim DeClue, Chamber Director; Regina Probst, City Attorney; City Staff

5.3 Consideration and Approval of the Low Bid to Repair the Roof at the Power Plant – Rick Eckert, City Manager

5.4 Continued Discussion on IRB’s for the Track and Field Facility – Mayor, Commission and Staff
6.   OPEN AGENDA (City Matters Only) (3 Minute Time Limit)
7.   REPORTS:
7.1      City Manager 
7.2      City Attorney
7.3      Department Superintendents
7.4      Mayor
7.5      City Commission

8.    RECESS – until Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. for Joint Meeting with the County.       

Monday, August 20, 2018

08/06/2018-Approved City Commission Meeting Minutes


MONDAY 

AUGUST 06, 2018

The Governing Body of the City of Pratt met in Regular Session in the Commission Room located at City Hall.
 
PRESENT:  
 
Doug Meyer  Mayor
Lucus Kumberg  Commissioner
Gary Schmidt  Commissioner
Don Peters  Commissioner


ALSO PRESENT: 

Roy Eckert  City Manager
LuAnn Kramer  City Clerk
Regina Probst  City Attorney
Diana Garten  Finance Director
Gary Myers  Police Chief
Russell Rambat  Public Works Director
Brad Blankenship Building Inspector
Jamie Huber  Dir. of Electric :Utilities
Bruce Pinkall  Recreation Director
        


CALL TO ORDER: 

The regular meeting was called to order by Mayor Meyer.  The Mayor instructed the City Clerk to note that all Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Leslie. 

The Mayor reminded the audience that this meeting may be taped and/or recorded. 

INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 

Commissioner Schmidt led the staff and audience in the invocation and Mayor Meyer led Pledge of Allegiance. 

CONSENT AGENDA:

·        July 16, 2018 Recessed City/County Commission Meeting
·        July 16, 2018 Regular Commission Meeting
·        July 19, 2018 Special Call Meeting #1
·        July 19, 2018 Special Call Meeting #2
·        July 26, 2018 Special Call Meeting
·        July 31, 2018 Special Call Meeting
 

Commissioner Kumberg made a motion to approve the consent agenda.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Peters and carried unanimously.

BUSINESS: 

2019 PROPOSED CITY OF PRATT BUDGET:

Mayor Meyer made a motion to open the public hearing.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Schmidt and carried unanimously. 

With no one having any discussion on the 2019 budget, Mayor Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Peters and carried unanimously. 

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE 2019 CITY OF PRATT BUDGET: 

Finance Director Garten stated that the Commission needed to approve the budget that had been published. Ms. Garten stated that the mill levy was 49.898 with taxes levied at $2,136,694.  Ms. Garten commented that, after the neighborhood revitalization, the City would receive $1,995,782 and the total budget was $22,469,624.  Mayor Meyer stated that the Commission and staff had met two whole days and also had a special call meeting to finish up; therefore, he felt that they had been diligent in the budget this year.  Commissioner Kumberg commented that the tax increase was flat if compared with last year and that made it five years in a row.  Commissioner Peters commented that City Manager Eckert had met with the department heads ahead of time and then they had met with the Commissioners and that was a good way to do it.   

With no further discussion, Commissioner Schmidt made a motion to approve the 2019 City of Pratt budget.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Peters and carried unanimously. 

PRESENTATION ON THE CITY’S FUTURE ENERGY SERVICE: 

Director of Electric Utilities Huber stated that we were about at the end of our contract with KMEA and we had some steps to take to get to the end of the EMP2 in April.  Mr. Huber commented that the Rainbow Energy representatives were here to help give the Commission a better understanding of why and what we needed to do.   

Mr. Bob Moye, from Rainbow Energy, commented that there were some things that needed done before the end of April and things that needed to be transferred.  Mr. Moye stated that this business was complicated and their parent was United Energy Corporation.  Mr. Moye commented that United Energy Corporation was founded in the 1980’s in all aspects of oil and natural gas production exploration along with marketing, which was what Rainbow Energy did.  Mr. Moye stated that they had expanded all across the country and did business in the United States, Canada and New Mexico.  Mr. Moye informed the Commission that their revenue last year was $1.4 billion.  Mr. Moye stated that Rainbow Energy Marketing was founded in 1984 and they had indirectly been doing marketing for the City for ten years by working with KMEA.  Mr. Moye explained the needs to participate in the energy market and the regional transmission organization (RTO).  Mr. Moye stated that they were very active in those markets.   

Mr. Nathan Sprague, from Rainbow’s Kansas City office, stated that the City had issued an intent to terminate its contract with KMEA a couple of years ago and would be out at the end of April 2019.  Mr. Sprague commented that the City wanted to procure their energy management services under their own independent operation within the Southwest Power Pool (SPP).  Mr. Sprague stated that the City would need to issue new transmission service reservation (TSR) requests under a new master Network Integrated Transmission Service (NITS) agreement with the SPP and designate all resources and energy contracts as designated network resources if they intend to have all load, resources and power purchase agreements to remain with the City.   

Mr. Sprague explained that the City would need to terminate the existing TSR’s as a member of EMP2 through KMEA and ensure that all the PPA contracts transfer directly to the City.  Mr. Sprague commented that the City would have to terminate the GRDA PPA scheduling arrangements with KMEA and, once all the new TSR requests were confirmed, the City could operate independently within the SPP as their own Asset Owner under the REMC Market Participant agreement.  Mr. Sprague added that all of the market transactions would flow financially through REMC and the City would pay them on a monthly basis for all market activities and fees.  Mr. Sprague stated that the City could participate as their own market participant as a member of SPP, but they could still execute the services they were providing as a market agent.  Commissioner Peters questioned how their fees were determined.  Mr. Sprague stated that it was typically how many assets you had registered in the market place.  Mr. Sprague commented that it was a function of how many schedules, how many settlement locations and how many transmission locations they would be managing.  Mr. Sprague stated that they use a software from ABB called Nostradamus to generate an hourly rolling seven day load forecast that would be based on recent load numbers and forward weather variables that they would extract from local weather stations.   

Mr. Sprague stated that operational strategy development and optimization could be discussed for hours.  Mr. Sprague explained that within SPP you had day ahead market and real time market.  Mr. Sprague commented that they try to settle as much of the transactions in the day ahead market as possible.  Mr. Sprague stated that every market participant in SPP would be submitting bids to buy energy and submitting offers to sell energy.  Mr. Sprague explained that SPP would package all of that together and they would say here was where supply meets demand and this was the marginal cost for power for this given hour in the day ahead market.  Mr. Sprague stated that you want to sell most of the transaction in that day ahead of market.  Mr. Sprague added that some of the tools and resources were their own weather forecasting software, an in-house meteorologist, a software called Yes Energy and their own proprietary applications.

Mr. Sprague stated that demand bid and resource offer submittals were relatively straight forward.  Mr. Sprague explained that there was one load settlement location that they submit a demand bid for to buy energy at the Pratt load point and the resource offers were at the same point for the internal generation.  Mr. Sprague commented that all the internal generation when Pratt runs would be sold at the Pratt generation point.  Mr. Sprague stated that they would submit the bids and offers that were involved to SPP and let them make the determination of how much energy you were awarded and in demand bids how much energy you were selling in resource offers and what that price would be.  Mr. Sprague showed the Commission an example of the software package they use called MCG IAM, which was an Integrated Asset Management software package by Minneapolis Consulting Group.  Mr. Sprague stated that it was their interface to SPP and was what they used to submit all their demand bids and resource offers through.

Mr. Sprague stated that congestion hedging management was like congestion on a roadway and you also had that on the transmission system as well.  Mr. Sprague commented that when SPP had difficulty moving power due to line limitations, it causes price disparity between those two points.  Mr. Sprague stated that you would be selling power at some other location, which you would be on your GRDA contract.  Mr. Sprague explained that you would be selling that power at GRDA generator pricing note and purchasing your energy at the Pratt load zone location.  Mr. Sprague stated that those prices could be totally different so, with the transmission service reservations, the City was allocated option revenue rights entitlements.  Mr. Sprague explained that that meant that they allow the City to say that we own the transmission between two points and we can put on a product that was going to pay the price spread between those two points.  Mr. Sprague stated that it basically brings that basis difference of what you were purchasing energy for and what you were selling energy for down to zero.  Mr. Sprague stated that they would make recommendations as to what portion of the reservations they turn into the congestion hedging products to hedge off expected sales with market place relative to the load that you were expected to purchase.  

Mr. Sprague stated that they lean heavily on their YES Energy software to execute these services.  Mr. Sprague explained that they could see the entire transmission system of above 69kv and look at forecasted transmission outages.   Mr. Sprague commented that they could drill into those outages to see what constraints pop in that overlap those outages, what pricing effects those constraints had on price points and how correlated they were to the outages.   

Mr. Sprague pointed out that they have 24–hour RT operational support staff that monitor all market unit commitments and then relay that information to the City’s staff.  Mr. Sprague stated that bilateral scheduling would be in regards to GRDA, which was a power purchase agreement where power was purchased through another counter party on a bilateral agreement.  Mr. Sprague commented that SPP calls that a bilateral settlement schedule and that allows them to tell SPP that we might not own the generator at that point; however, you had made an agreement with another counter party to buy energy from them at that point.  Mr. Sprague stated that they had to submit those bilateral schedules to facilitate that transaction.  Mr. Sprague added that they were done hourly around the clock. 

Mr. Sprague commented that Pratt had three internal generators that were registered within SPP and, in order to keep SPP up to speed as far as resource availability, they had to utilize their control room operations window to tell SPP when we got forecasted generation outages, whether they were forced or planned.  Mr. Sprague stated that SPP settles in the day ahead every hour and, in the real time balancing market, it was a five minute market.  Mr. Sprague commented that there were fifty-five charge code types, so fifty-five different types of market transactional settlements occur every five minutes.  Mr. Sprague stated that they propose to reconcile those statements and report back to the City in a package that was more condensed and easier to understand.

Mr. Sprague stated that their transitional fee of $2,000 per month would be effective when we all came to terms on an agreement and would be through the April date when the KMEA operational contract was terminated.  Mr. Sprague commented that the operational fee was $7,000 per month and would be effective once the City’s exit from KMEA had occurred and you were under full independent operations of your own with a SPP.  Mr. Sprague added that the initial term was three years with a subsequent annual evergreen renewal and a sixty day notice to terminate the agreement. 

Mr. Sprague concluded stating that REMC had a skilled staff of experienced traders, engineers and operators with decades of RTO management and marketing experience.  Mr. Sprague commented that they did not own resources that would conflict with the City’s operations and they were a private company that was bound by contractual terms to treat each Energy Management Services customer the same. 

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF A 5K HELD ON SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 22ND SPONSORED BY THE LEADERSHIP PRATT 2017-2018 CLASS: 

Mr. Todd Hoffman stated that the project for the Leadership Pratt 2017-2018 class was to help Care Closet.  Mr. Hoffman explained that the program had been started at Southwest School and they just wanted to support them with a 5K on September 22nd.  Mayor Meyer asked if there were any conflicts with schedules.  Recreation Director Pinkall stated that it was the Oktoberfest, but that should not be a problem.  Mr. Hoffman commented that they would start at Lemon Park and have volunteers along the route.  Mr. Hoffman added that they would not be crossing any major highways. With no further discussion, Commissioner Kumberg made a motion to approve the 5K for Leadership Pratt 2017-2018 as presented by Mr. Todd Hoffman.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Schmidt and carried unanimously. 

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT: 

Public Works Director Rambat stated that he had made an error on quantities for square yards on the mill and overlay project on Country Club Road.  Mr. Rambat stated that the contractor got two-thirds of the way through and had contacted him that they were going to go over by quite a bit.  Mr. Rambat explained that they had already edge milled; therefore, he made the choice to complete the project and he would be adjusting the street seal project.  Mr. Rambat recommended that the Commission approve the second payment to APAC of $19,759 and he would then adjust another summer project so that there would not be any budgetary problems.  Commissioner Peters made a motion to approve the additional funds for the mill and overlay project in the amount of $19,759.  Commissioner Schmidt seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 080618 AUTHORIZING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL AT THE GREEN SPORTS COMPLEX DURING OKTOBERFEST 2018 ON SEPTEMBER 22ND: 

City Attorney Probst stated that Mr. John Beverlin had actually drafted this resolution so she asked that he address the Commission.  Mr. Beverlin stated that the State Statute requires the City to approve this resolution for the Oktoberfest, which would be sent to ABC designating the date, time and references the ordinance previously passed.  Mr. Beverlin added that ABC would then issue them the temporary permit.   

The following Resolution 080618 was then presented to the Commission for their approval:  A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONSUMPTION AND SALE OF ALCOHOL AT THE GREEN SPORTS COMPLEX, PRATT, KANSAS, FOR PRATT OKTOBERFEST ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2018 AS A SPECIAL EVENT PURSUANT TO K.S.A. 41-2645.  Commissioner Kumberg made a motion to approve Resolution 080618 authorizing the consumption and sale of alcohol at the Green Sports Complex for Pratt Oktoberfest on September 22, 2018.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Peters and carried unanimously.   

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 1808 INCORPORATING THE 2018 UNIFORM PUBLIC OFFENSE CODE FOR KANSAS CITIES – 2018 EDITION: 

City Attorney Probst stated that pages 180-181 of the July Kansas Government Journal summarizes the changes to the Uniform Public Offense Code and the Standard Traffic Ordinance books.  Ms. Probst commented that the City was in need of a littering ordinance and there was one added to the UPOC under Section 8 that was previously reserved, so that solved the problem that the City had.  Ms. Probst explained that the City historically included an omission of a number of items, such as worthless checks, vehicle sales, barbed wire, medical vending machines and cruelty to animals.  Ms. Probst stated that she would also like to omit sections 9.9.1 and 9.9.2.  Ms. Probst explained that the City had not traditionally adopted an ordinance that would allow the City prosecutor to prosecute drug paraphernal crimes.  Ms. Probst commented that she had tried to get hold of the County Attorney to see why the City had not prosecuted those crimes, because they were misdemeanors and the City would have the ability to prosecute. 

Chief Myers commented that they incorporate the crimes into District Court instead of splitting the crime.  Chief Myers stated that he also questioned why the City could not adopt an ordinance that would allow an officer to issue a Notice to Appear for a misdemeanor possession of marijuana instead of having to make a custodial arrest.  Chief Myers stated that he understood that in order to do that through Municipal Court upon conviction, the person convicted would be ordered to receive counseling and the City would be responsible for that cost, but that cost was now passed on to the County.   

Commissioner Kumberg questioned if we had more restrictive ordinances for the ones that were being omitted.  Ms. Probst stated that we did on cruelty to animals, but she did not think we did on the barbed wire and medicine through a vending machine.  Ms. Probst added that the City was not following the UPOC, but would follow the State Statute.  Mayor Meyer asked about a City ordinance or State Statute concerning bikes on sidewalks.  Chief Myers stated that there was a municipal ordinance for the downtown area; however, it did not apply to residential areas.  Chief Myers explained that that did include skate boards, skates and bikes.  With no more discussion, Mayor Meyer stated that this ordinance would be tabled until the next meeting so that Ms. Probst could make the changes she had presented.

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 1809 INCORPORATING THE 2018 STANDARD TRAFFIC ORDINANCE FOR KANSAS CITIES – 2018 EDITION: 

Ms. Probst stated that the changes to the Standard Traffic Ordinances were also outlined in the Kansas Government Journal and she asked that the Commission pass the ordinance as it was presented in the agenda.  Ms. Probst commented that the omissions had to do with different speed limits and specific sections outlined for the 20 mph for school zones.  Mayor Meyer questioned all those addresses; however, the City currently did not have the school at Sacred Heart anymore and Haskins had changed to something else also.  Ms. Probst stated that she had not had any complaints to check into that.  Ms. Probst commented that she was thankful for the published STO’s since it made it easier for the officers that transfer from other jurisdictions.  Ms. Probst explained that the changes had to do with constitutional complaints that had come before various courts and orders from the various courts regarding preliminary breathe tests and DUI.  Ms. Probst added that there were a few other minor wording changes and section updates.  Ms. Probst stated that the primary change was the DUI ordinance and it was the longest Statute in the Kansas Statutes.  Ms. Probst commented that this also affected the commercial DUI Statute.   

The following Ordinance 1809 was then presented to the Commission for their approval:  AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.04 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF PRATT, KANSAS PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF TRAFFIC WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF PRATT; INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE THE “STANDARD TRAFFIC ORDINANCE FOR KANSAS CITIES,” 2018 EDITION, WITH CERTAIN OMISSIONS, CHANGES, AND ADDITIONS; PRESCRIBING ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS; PROVIDING CERTAIN PENALTIES; AND REPEALING CHAPTER 10.4. Commissioner Peters made a motion to approve Ordinance 1809 as presented.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kumberg and carried unanimously. 

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCES IMPLEMENTING THE INCREASE OF THE MINIMUM CHARGES FOR WATER, SEWER AND SANITATION: 

·        Ordinance 1810-Sanitation Fees
·        Ordinance 1811-Water Fees
·        Ordinance 1812-Sewer Fees 

Ms. Probst stated that these ordinances were provided for in the budget meetings and would increase the water, sewer and sanitation fees by $2.50 to help pay for the increase in employee’s health insurance costs.  Ms. Probst commented that these new rates would be effective September 01, 2018.  Mayor Meyer stated that the City had had a substantial increase in health insurance and this was the least painless increase that would generate the revenue.  Commissioner Kumberg stated that they had done away with the provision with the health insurance for the Commission in order to limit the increase.  

With no further discussion, the following Ordinance 1810 was then presented to the Commission for approval:  AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8.28.070 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF PRATT, KANSAS; PROVIDING FOR REFUSE COLLECTION FEES.  Commissioner Peters made a motion to approve Ordinance 1810 concerning the sanitation fees.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Schmidt and carried unanimously. 

The following Ordinance 1811 was then presented to the Commission for approval:  AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 13.04.100 OF THE PRATT MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF PRATT, KANSAS: WATER RATES – ESTABLISHED.  Commissioner Schmidt made a motion to approve Ordinance 1811 pertaining to water fee increases.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Peters and carried unanimously.   

The following Ordinance 1812 was then presented to the Commission for approval:  AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 13.16.090 OF THE PRATT MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF PRATT, KANSAS: SEWER USER RATES – ESTABLISHED.  Commissioner Kumberg made a motion to approve Ordinance 1812 concerning sewer rates.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Schmidt and carried unanimously.

OPEN AGENDA:

No one in the audience wished to address the Commission.

REPORTS:
 
City Manager:

·        Retirements:

City Manager Eckert stated that we were starting to see movement in some of the longest serving staff.  Mr. Eckert clarified that we were looking at several that were talking about retirement and giving advance notice.  Mr. Eckert added that he had a tremendous staff and we hoped to have people who come up in the ranks to fill those positions.

·        Solar Farm:

Mr. Eckert stated that they were in the early state of dirt work for the solar farm and the crews were working on that portion of the project.  Mr. Eckert commented that the terrain was more significant than some had thought and it would take more work to get it to the right level.  Mr. Eckert added that we had two weeks max to get that dirt work done.

·        Water legislation:

Mr. Eckert stated that water legislation was an issue in Topeka and the problem was saying that we had to use a lot of water to protect our water rights.  Mr. Eckert commented that it was nice to be on the water board because it was things like this that he heard about ahead of time.  Mayor Meyer stated that the article in the paper was a good one.

·        Utilities:

Mr. Eckert commented that sanitation, water and sewer were operated by City staff and they were not just another situation that brings in revenue.  Mr. Eckert stated that we could not live without them and they get taken for granted sometimes.

·        Rainbow Energy:

Mr. Eckert stated that he had met with Rainbow Energy one time in Pratt and he was impressed then.  Mr. Eckert added that he had also accompanied Director of Electric Utilities Huber to Kansas City to see their operation in house.  Mr. Eckert commented that it was amazing how they were monitoring what was changing and when to lock it in.  Mr. Eckert stated that we were getting the best of the best.

·        Succession for Retirees:

Commissioner Kumberg questioned if we were looking down the ranks for people to take over for the ones that were thinking about retirement.  Mr. Eckert stated that we had one retire Friday and that was a surprise.  Commissioner Kumberg commented that we needed to be looking down the line and start conversations to fill those rolls.  Mr. Eckert stated that we were looking at it now.  Public Works Director Rambat stated that there was not a lot out in the work force and it was hard to keep the employees that we have now.

Public Works:

·        Mill and Overlay:

Public Works Director Rambat stated that they were done with the mill and overlay, but they had some small areas to get to out west by the Kwik Shop on Washington.  Mr. Rambat explained that there was no curb in the 100 block of Washington and truckers and visitors park on the front lawn.  Mr. Rambat commented that adding a curb would help with drainage also.  Mr. Rambat stated that he also wanted to go up north on Main Street and do some new curb and sidewalk by the Chapeau.

·        Street Sweeper:

Mr. Rambat stated that he would be bringing the recommendation for the new street sweeper to the next meeting and he thought that the financing paper work would be ready at that time also.

Recreation Department:

·        Municipal Building:

Recreation Director Pinkall stated that he should have the final report from the consulting engineer with some options and things we could do concerning the heating and air at the Municipal Building.  Mr. Pinkall commented that he had met with some people who were fairly knowledgeable with tax benefits for historical buildings.  Mr. Pinkall stated that they would see if this was cost effective, which was part of the initial survey.  Mr. Pinkall added that they should have air conditioning by the spring of 2019.  Mr. Pinkall commented that they were looking at other things like plumbing; however, that was not their main focus.

Finance Department:

·        Sales Tax:

Finance Director Garten stated that the City’s sales tax numbers were looking really good; however, she thought it was due to the construction projects, the wind farm, Americare and summer events.  Ms. Garten commented that she had not had time to research it but thought that there were back taxes in there, but it was a positive trend. 

Mayor and Commission:

·        Lemon Park:

Mayor Meyer stated that he saw what had happened to Lemon Park after the rain and the parks department did a great job getting it cleaned up.  Mr. Rambat stated that those guys were all over sixty and they did do a good job.

ADJOURN:
 
Commissioner Schmidt made a motion to adjourn.  That motion was seconded by Commissioner Peters and carried unanimously.
 
_____________________________________
DOUG MEYER, Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________________
LUANN KRAMER, City Clerk  

Thursday, August 16, 2018

08/20/2018-City Commission Meeting Agenda


MONDAY

AUGUST 20, 2018 

PRATT CITY COMMISSION – REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING

COMMISSION ROOM – 5:00 P.M. 

1.      CALL TO ORDER (Remind the audience that meeting is being recorded and/or taped.)
2.      ROLL CALL
3.      INVOCATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.   CONSENT AGENDA:

      4.1 Minutes:           August 06, 2018 Regular Commission Meeting
                                                                                                                              
5.   BUSINESS:
      
      5.1 Discussion on IRB’s – Dr. Mike Calvert, PCC President
      5.2 Discussion on Changes to Ordinance 0503 Dealing with Travel and Tourism – Kim            DeClue, Chamber Director; Regina Probst, City Attorney

5.3 Consideration and Approval of the Purchase of a New Street Sweeper – Russell Rambat, Public Works Director

5.4Consideration and Approval of Financing for the Purchase of the Street Sweeper – Diana Garten, Finance Director

5.5 Consideration and Approval of the Purchase of a New Mower for the Parks Department – Russell Rambat, Public Works Director
 
5.6 Consideration and Approval of Ordinance 1808 Incorporating the 2018 Uniform Public Offense Code for Kansas Cities – 2018 Edition – Regina Probst, City Attorney
 
5.7 Consideration and Approval of Pratt City Attorney Agreement – Regina Probst, City Attorney

6.   OPEN AGENDA (City Matters Only) (3 Minute Time Limit)
7.   REPORTS:

7.1      City Manager 
7.2      City Attorney
7.3      Department Superintendents
7.4      Mayor
7.5      City Commission

8.    ADJOURN          

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

07/31/2018-Approved City Commission Special Call Meeting Minutes


TUESDAY
 
JULY 31, 2018

The Governing Body of the City of Pratt met in a Special Call meeting in the Commission Room located in City Hall.

 PRESENT:  
 
Doug Meyer  Mayor
Lucus Kumberg  Commissioner
Gary Schmidt  Commissioner
Don Peters  Commissioner
 
ALSO PRESENT: 
 
Roy Eckert  City Manager
LuAnn Kramer  City Clerk
Regina Probst  City Attorney
(By Conference Call)
Diana Garten  Finance Director
CALL TO ORDER:

The special call meeting was called to order by Mayor Meyer.  The Mayor instructed the City Clerk to note that all Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Leslie.

BUSINESS:
 
DISCUSSION ON IRB’S FOR THE TRACK FACILITY AT THE GREEN SPORTS COMPLEX:
 
Mayor Meyer stated that the track facility was discussed during budget session and it was decided that the City would not issue any bonds to finance the facility.  Mayor Meyer informed those present that no decisions would be made today since all five of the Commissioners were not present.  Mayor Meyer commented that the Commission was willing to be educated in this meeting out of respect to Dr. Calvert, PCC President.

Dr. Calvert explained that they were in the process of privately fund raising and working on grant dollars for the track and field at Green Sports Complex.  Dr. Calvert stated that they were very excited about it and they had currently raised about $2 million of the $3½ million project.  Dr. Calvert commented that they would like to seek bond funding for the balance and continue to fund raise to pay for that bond.  Dr. Calvert explained that they could do a GO bond; however, they would be subject to notice and protest.  Dr. Calvert commented that it would probably get protested and would then have to go to the vote of the pubic.  Dr. Calvert stated that they had asked that the City be the bond issuer and the College fund it; however, the City had said no.  

Dr. Calvert stated that they had other options and one would be IRB’s issued by the City and they had more advantages, less baggage and less requirements.  Mr. Kent Adams added that these would not count against the City’s ratio or debt services.  Dr. Calvert asked if the City was familiar with IRB’s.  Commissioner Kumberg stated that they had had them with Parkwood and South Wind Hospice and neither one ended very well.  Mr. Adams explained that the Foundation of the College would actually be the bond holder, the College would lease the facility from the Foundation to service the debt.  Dr. Calvert stated that the property would be legally owned by the City until the bonds were paid off.

Mr. Kevin Cowan, Gilmore and Bell, stated that the difference between GO bonds and IRB’s was dramatic.  Mr. Cowan explained that a City GO bond was the most secure obligation the City could offer.  Mr. Cowan commented that GO bonds did not involve ad-volerum taxes; however, the City could be forced to levy taxes to make the payment.  Mr. Cowan added that there was no risk of default because there was access to taxes.  Mr. Cowan stated that IRB’s were a special obligation and were pledged to the facility that was being financed.  Mr. Cowan commented that the City had had others for utility operations and pledged revenues for that utility to make the payment.  Mr. Cowan stated that the City was the conduit by doing this for someone else.  Mr. Cowan stated that, once the College agrees to a lease agreement, it would be binding and the College had to make the payment.  

Commissioner Schmidt asked if all the revenue would go to the Foundation or if the City would keep some of the revenue when they actually use the facility.  Mr. Cowan stated that the revenue generated was pledged for the bond payment; however, revenue from special events were not specially for the bonds.  Mr. Cowan added that, if the City had dates or side agreements with a school district, then those revenues would belong to the City. 

Commissioner Kumberg explained that there were some constraints on the property when it was deeded and that property could not transfer hands.  Mr. Cowan stated that in unique circumstances the IRB’s would make some sense.  Mr. Cowan commented that, in a leased based structure, it had to have real property interest and all would be leased to the IRB tenant.  Commissioner Kumberg questioned if there was a time limit.  Mr. Cowan stated that there was not really; however, it was hard to find bond purchases who want to tie up their bond funds for a long time.  Mr. Adams stated that they were talking about fifteen to twenty years.  Commissioner Kumberg commented that ten to fifteen was more attractive. 

Commissioner Peters questioned if there was any liability at all or financial risks.  Mr. Cowan commented that you could not pledge any Government revenue payments to the City.  Commissioner Peters asked how they would produce revenue if they did not have enough from the Foundation and if they could increase the mill levy to make this payment.  Mr. Cowan stated that the college was not subject to the tax lid; therefore, they had the ability to fill that shortfall. 

Dr. Calvert stated that the original proposal showed revenue dollars and nothing had changed for the scope of the project.  Dr. Calvert added that they intended this to be a collaborative project and a win/win for the community.  Dr. Calvert commented that the College was willing to take the financial risk and they were under the gun for some Federal grant parameters.  Dr. Calvert stated that they had requested an extension; however, they had to turn earth in 2018.  Dr. Calvert commented that they had to meet the parameters for the $300,000 and they were looking at another $300,000 of Federal grant funds.  Commissioner Kumberg stated that he applauded them for coming back with another option, because the community was taxed out.  Commissioner Kumberg stated that this would all be good if it comes together, but we were in a position that we had to hold the line.  Dr. Calvert stated that he understood and that, if they did not have a parameter or grants, they would not be having this conversation.  Mayor Meyer stated that this meeting was informative and he had learned a lot.  Mayor Meyer asked what the next step would be after they digested this information.  Mayor Meyer added that the City would also do things in kind.  Dr. Calvert commented that State funding would hopefully get better than it was since they only received about 20% of their funding from the State.  Mayor Meyer stated that the lease payment would come from the lease obligation.  Mr. Adams commented that this total amount of the issue was a little more than 10% of their cash reserves.

ADJOURN:

A motion by Commissioner Schmidt to adjourn was seconded by Commissioner Peters and carried unanimously.
 
_____________________________________
DOUG MEYER, Mayor

ATTEST:
 
______________________________________
LUANN KRAMER, City Clerk